![]() ![]() The end result was increased overall costs. The result is the F-35, arguably a great jet, or really three great jets that in a previous time would have been considered three completely different aircraft. ![]() As ICBMs and missile defense systems are upgraded or replaced there will be acquisition pressure from Congress for the services to work together to find a common lift vehicle for satellites and nuclear warheads.ĭon’t believe it? When the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps all needed a new fighter, the DoD was forced to integrate the acquisition programs to save money. The Space Force will be the lead for developing new rockets to lift satellites into space. Since mass to orbit (space launch) or mass through ballistic delivery (ICBMs) follows the same physics and space personnel are trained in this domain, it follows that space personnel are already optimized to integrate these missions. Both systems are, for all intents and purposes, space warfare systems. adversaries Russia and China.īoth ICBMs and ground-based interceptors are dual-use technologies, which will do their mission in the space locality (near-earth space) occupied by many of the systems conducting other Space Force missions. These kill vehicles are technological siblings of direct ascent anti-satellite (ASAT) systems like those currently deployed by potential U.S. Missile defense interceptors, on the other hand, are smaller rockets which deliver an exo-atmospheric “kill vehicle” to near-earth space in order to engage and destroy ICBM warheads outside of the atmosphere.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |